Question For Pro-lifers
Below is a story that raises
a very important question. A 27 year old
man was shot by a police officer in order to stop the beating being inflicted
upon a 2 year old child - here's the question for pro-lifers out there:
shouldn't police treat the child who is still in the womb on his way to the
abortion mill with the same urgency?
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/06/15/AR2008061502329.html?nav=rss_nation
Man
Beating Toddler Is Slain By Police in
Associated Press
Monday, June 16, 2008; Page A02
TURLOCK, Calif., June 15 -- Police killed a 27-year-old man as he kicked, punched and stomped a toddler to death despite other people's attempts to stop him on a dark country road, authorities said Sunday.
Investigators were trying to establish the relationship between the suspect and the child they said he killed Saturday night. The Stanislaus County coroner said the boy appeared to be between 1 and 2 years old based on his size, according to Royjindar Singh, the county sheriff's deputy.
"It's been a long night of wondering why -- not only for the officers and the passersby who stopped and tried to help out, but for anyone: Why would somebody do this?" Singh said.
Because the child's injuries were so severe, he will have to be identified through a blood test or DNA test, Singh said.
The suspect had a child's car seat in the back of his four-door pickup truck. The truck caught the attention of an elderly couple at 10:13 p.m. Saturday because it was stopped in the two-lane road facing the wrong direction, Singh said.
As they got closer, the couple saw the man brutally beating the toddler behind his truck and throwing the child on the ground, according to Singh. Two or three other cars stopped, an unusual number to be passing through the remote area, he said.
"What we got from witnesses is he was punching, slapping, kicking, stomping, shaking," Singh said. "They tried to intervene and get involved, but their efforts really didn't have an effect. . . . He just pushed them off and went back to it."
A sheriff's helicopter carrying a Modesto police officer landed in a cow pasture at 10:19 p.m. The officer fatally shot the man after he refused an order to stop beating the child, Singh said.
The toddler was not breathing when paramedics arrived. He was taken to a local hospital, where he was pronounced dead.
No children within the dead boy's age range have been reported kidnapped or missing in Stanislaus County, Singh said.
If the child in the womb is
just as human as the child who has been born, why should they not be afforded
the same measure of protection? Please
answer this and follow the progression of logic with honesty.
Labels: California
posted by UR at
8:12 AM
4 Comments:
I wholeheartedly agree with the premise of this article but unfortunately, those who would kill the unborn for their own selfish reasons do not see the unborn as a human. It's just an "it" but surely not a human. THAT is the problem. Mother Teresa probably said it best when she spoke before the National Prayer Breakfast in Wash, DC in 1994, including an audience of the Clintons and Gores, "...If we accept that a mother can kill even her own child, how can we tell other people not to kill one another?...Any country that accepts abortion is not teaching its people to love, but to use any violence to get what they want. This is why the greatest destroyer of love and peace is abortion.".
The beginning of freedom for this country is when we march together as one and stop the murder of these children.
The weakening we are experiencing as a county is just the decomposing results of our murderous behavior.
I would join an army of men that would march together to deliver these children from death.
Some people might use this as proof that some types of people should not have kids. When men start taking emotional and financial responsibility for the women they impregnate, fewer women will choose abortions. We have to work on making this world safe for children to be born. Valuing children starts with valuing women. I am very impressed with the Christian group, the Twelve Tribes, because they have actually established a proven effective way for low income Christians to communally share a home and thus be able to raise a family in a safe and loving environment.
www.twelvetribes.org
First some assumptions,
1) The toddler had a birth certificate, the unborn do not.
2) The birth certificate had an ALL CAPITALIZED NAME. All Caps is the name of an artificial "person" created by government, not a christian name.
3) Birth Certificates are used as proof of collateral for federal government international loans. All future earnings being "taxable".
4) The toddler had a Social Security number. Proof of priveleged federal government, U.S. Citizen status.
Government is obligated to protect it's property, the unborn are not government property.
501 (c) 3 status Churches do not challenge the government in order to protect their "tax exempt status". This makes them more fearful of their servant than of their creator God.
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link